Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Rotchford v. State of Washington
as 2:2022cv00727
Petitioner:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rotchford v. Petraeus et al
as 2:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Defendant:
David Petraeus, Colin Powell and Raymond Odierno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotchford v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2021cv00057
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rotchford v. Clallam County et al
as 3:2020cv05964
Defendant:
Brent Basden, James Kennedy, Clallam County and others
Plaintiff:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rotchford v. Jefferson County et al
as 3:2020cv05965
Defendant:
Brent Basden, Jefferson County, James Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rotchford v. Suckoh et al
as 3:2019cv06254
Defendant:
Pence, Munoz and Suckoh
Plaintiff:
Fraser Rotchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rotchford v. The Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv05290
Defendant:
Officer Raoul, Sgt. Royson, The Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rotchford v. Department of Corrections
as 4:2019cv05291
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rotchford v. Swanson Services Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv05485
Defendant:
Clallam County Correctional Facility and Swanson Services Corporation
Plaintiff:
Fraser Rotchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rotchford v. King County Prosecuting Attorney et al
as 2:2019cv00359
Defendant:
The Chinese Judge on King County Superior Court, Rogers, Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Fraser Rotchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
