Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Capstone Building Corp v. Travis et al
as 2:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Capstone Building Corp
Defendant:
Christopher Travis, Michael Hendrickson, Zack Shewmaker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller v. S&S Used Auto Sales, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Miller
Defendant:
S&S Used Auto Sales, LLC and Jamie Narron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Hill v. S & S Recovery Inc
as 5:2022cv01517
Plaintiff:
Nia Hill
Defendant:
S & S Recovery Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sims et al v. Blockton et al
as 2:2022cv00745
Plaintiff:
Angelik Sims, H. S. S. and V. M. S., III
Defendant:
Nakita Blockton, Katherine E Thompkins and Dr. Alan Blotcky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
The Water Works and Sewer Board of the Town of Centre v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2017cv01026
Plaintiff:
The Water Works and Sewer Board of the Town of Centre
Defendant:
3M Company , Shaw Industries Inc , Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Water Works and Sewer Board of Gadsden v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2016cv01755
Plaintiff:
The Water Works and Sewer Board of Gadsden
Defendant:
3M Company , Apricot International Inc, Arrowstar LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
