Cases 1 - 10 of 1,172
Eminence Corporation of Maryland v. Pierluisi-Urrutia et al
as 3:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
EMINENCE CORPORATION OF MARYLAND
Defendant:
Pedro Pierluisi-Urrutia, Manuel Cidre-Miranda, Treasury Department of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
US v. Sanchez-Colberg
as 24-1392
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN SANCHEZ-COLBERG
Sanchez-Jimenez v. US, et al
as 24-1364
Plaintiff:
JOSE AMAURY SANCHEZ-JIMENEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and MARIANO GARAY-ORTIZ
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Chehardy, Sherman, Williams, Recile & Hayes LLP. et al v. Recovery Legal Group et al
as 3:2024cv01141
Plaintiff:
CHEHARDY, SHERMAN, WILLIAMS, RECILE & HAYES, LLP and THE KING FIRM
Defendant:
RECOVERY LEGAL GROUP, LAW OFFICE OF RAFAEL E. RIVERA-SANCHEZ, Maytte Texidor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Diaz-Santiago v. Sanchez-Acosta, et al
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
RAY LEONERDIRT DIAZ-SANTIAGO
Defendant:
JOSE SANCHEZ-ACOSTA, Attorney and MANUEL CIDRE-MIRANDA
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
US v. Soto-Sanchez
as 24-1184
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
VICTOR SOTO-SANCHEZ, a/k/a Newton Batista, a/k/a Hooka
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10461
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
