Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith (PS) et al v. WCDTF et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Nathan J Smith and Holly M Smith
Defendant:
WCDTF, GJPD, Sherrifs Office and others
Springer v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodall et al v. Williams
as 1:2018cv00980
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lamborn , Lamborn for Congress , Melissa Renee Goodall and others
Defendant:
Wayne W. Williams
Intervenor:
Michael Kuhn , Ashley Springer , Lydia Honken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springer v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2017cv01055
Plaintiff:
David Springer
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Springer et al v. Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company, The
as 1:2015cv02567
Plaintiff:
Gregg E. Springer and Linda Springer
Defendant:
Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Springer
as 1:2013cv00838
Defendant:
Cefton A Springer
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Springer v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv02606
Plaintiff:
Monte Springer
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Springer v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2008cv02104
Plaintiff:
Eric V. Springer
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dillon Companies, Inc. et al v. Lopez et al
as 1:2007cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dillon Companies, Inc., Dillon Companies, Inc., Dillon Companies, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Sam Lopez, Jr., Jimmy Abeyta, Al Head and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Castaneda v. Springer et al
as 1:2007cv00382
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Castaneda
Defendant:
Matt Springer, Todd Renner, Todd Renner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
