Cases 11 - 20 of 63
EUBANKS et al v. MTD PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. EUBANKS and ELIZABETH EUBANKS
Defendant:
MTD PRODUCTS, INC. and BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STRATTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03351
Plaintiff:
TYREE STRATTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PEAY v. SAGER et al
as 1:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
STRATTON PEAY
Defendant:
SAGER, BERRY, SMAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LM INSURANCE CORPORATION v. MTD PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02504
Plaintiff:
LM INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
MTD PRODUCTS, INC. , BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION and MTD CONSUMER GROUP, INC.
Cross_claimant:
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
MTD PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
WATSON v. CHESTER COUNTY NISSAN, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00571
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY WATSON
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY NISSAN, LLC , JOHN D. STRATTON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
DENNY et al v. BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION et al
as 3:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DENNY and AMY DENNY
Defendant:
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION , BRIGGS & STRATTON POWER PRODUCTS GROUP, LLC and LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fassett et al v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00941
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fassett and Leslie Fassett
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation , Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peay v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00345
Plaintiff:
Stratton Peay
Defendant:
J. Fisher, L. Oliver, J. Whitesel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRATTON v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00371
Petitioner:
TYREE STRATTON
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
