Cases 1 - 10 of 1,332
Ortega v. The Pizzeria of Islip LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03392
Plaintiff:
Santos Ortega
Defendant:
The Pizzeria of Islip LLC, Paul Saccoccio, Clifford Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Sanchez-Portillo v. Garland
as 24-1117
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN SANCHEZ-PORTILLO, KAREN YANES-SANTOS, ZOE MATUTE-YANES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mosquea v. Contract Transportation Systems Co. et al
as 2:2024cv02938
Plaintiff:
Santo Mosquea
Defendant:
Contract Transportation Systems Co. and Joel D. Aviles Samol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
De Los Santos v. White et al
as 1:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Jean Carlos Morel De Los Santos
Defendant:
Trumaine White and Walmart Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
De Los Santos Martinez v. 11 Kitchen Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02851
Plaintiff:
Cornelio De Los Santos Martinez
Defendant:
11 Kitchen Inc. doing business as Wok Wok Southeast Asian Kitchen and Erik Cheah
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Franco-Santos v. Garland
as 24-909
Petitioner:
JUAN FRANCO-SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Croney v. Doe et al
as 9:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Norman Croney
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, Michael Deamoru, Dannielle Medburry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
