Cases 1 - 10 of 124
(HC) Sharp v. Borla
as 1:2024cv00326
Petitioner:
Anthony Andre Sharp
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Sharp v. Borla
as 1:2023cv01557
Petitioner:
Anthony Andre Sharp
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp v. Jeff Lynch et al.
as 2:2023cv08317
Petitioner:
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch, Altom, Axelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Van den Heuvel v. El Dorado County Judicials et al
as 2:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
John Mark Van den Heuvel
Defendant:
El Dorado County Judicials, Brandon Sharp, Kyle Aaron Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Phoenix House California et al
as 3:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Phoenix House California, Frank Sharpe and Does1-through-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Lynch et al.
as 3:2023cv02615
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Altom, Axelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Adam Sharpe v. Warden
as 2:2022cv08874
Petitioner:
Adam Sharpe
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01428
Plaintiff:
Keith White
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Frank Sharpe, J. Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Rayvone Robinson
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, J. Gallegos, Frank Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Martinez
as 3:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Anthony A. Sharp
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
