Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dorf v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 8:2011cv00310
Plaintiff:
Joan Dorf
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharpe v. Horning et al
as 1:2010cv03356
Petitioner:
Thomas W. Sharpe
Respondent:
Kenneth Horning and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Akinro v. Social Security Administration et al et al
as 1:2010cv01170
Plaintiff:
Francis Akinro
Defendant:
Social Security Administration et al, Iya Osho, Brandley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Krahling v. Sharp
as 1:2009cv02736
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Krahling
Defendant:
Norman R. Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Sharp et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
as 1:2009cv02622
Plaintiff:
Lisa Sharp and Matthew Barnes
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Libonati et al v. Ransom et al
as 1:2009cv01901
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Libonati, Cynthia Libonati, Cynthia Libonati and others
Defendant:
Dora D. Williams Ransom, Leslie L. Ransom, Sr. and Katherine G. Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Sharp Steel Erectors, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00140
Plaintiff:
Kelli J. White and Kelli J. White
Defendant:
Sharp Steel Erectors, Inc. and Mitchell Lawrence O'Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv02935
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
