Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Doe v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 6:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Christopher Nakamoto, Shanard Carey, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sharp v. TA Operating LLC
as 3:2020cv01143
Plaintiff:
Tommie Sharp
Defendant:
TA Operating LLC and TA Operating LLC doing business as TravelCenters of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv01484
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Cindi Sue Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Sharpe v. Platt et al
as 2:2019cv01162
Plaintiff:
Joshua Chiarello Sharpe
Defendant:
"John" Platt and "John" Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helling v. Koehler et al
as 6:2019cv00678
Defendant:
Roberto Robles, Stephen Gunnels, Mitchell Meyer and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Helling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Traynor et al
as 6:2018cv00785
Respondent:
Flora Salcido, Dr. Gundru, Sharp and others
Petitioner:
George Patton Nelson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox et al v. Astarita et al
as 3:2018cv00165
Defendant:
And other Men, W. Joseph Astarita, Greg T. Bretzing and others
Plaintiff:
Shawna Cox, Ryan-C: Family of Bundy, Ryan Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox et al v. Astarita et al
as 2:2018cv00165
Defendant:
And other Men, W. Joseph Astarita, Greg T. Bretzing and others
Plaintiff:
Shawna Cox, Ryan-C: Family of Bundy, Ryan Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00187
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
