Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammond-Beville v. Landis et al
as 3:2020cv00973
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hammond-Beville
Defendant:
Cheatham County, Tennessee, Kathy Morante, Jeff Landis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester v. Cleveland Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00083
Defendant:
J. M. Sharp and City of Cleveland, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wooten v. Coleman et al (TV2)
as 4:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Jimmy Coleman, Kellie Fogus, Michael Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Imperial Guard and Detective Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02332
Defendant:
Imperial Guard and Detective Services, Inc., Brewer Guard and Detective Services, Inc., Imperial Security Services and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharp v. Technicolor Videocassette of Michigan, Inc., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02325
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharp
Defendant:
Technicolor Videocassette of Michigan, Inc. and Staffing Solutions Southeast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sharp v. Technicolor USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00379
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharp
Defendant:
Technicolor USA, Inc. and Prologistics, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rutherford County General Sessions Court et al v. Bey
as 3:2017cv01233
Plaintiff:
Rutherford County General Sessions Court, Mike Levy, Tennessee, State of and others
Defendant:
Randy Sharp Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
