Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Perkins v. Sharpe, et al
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Niheem Perkins
Defendant:
Sharpe and Craighead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Sharp v. Towarnicki et al
as 7:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Gregory James Sharp
Defendant:
Leon Towarnicki, Chad Martin and Alison B. Linas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Sharp
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chase v. Anderson et al
as 7:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Alexander Csaky Chase
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Michael McBride, B.S. Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Mathena, et al
as 7:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
Rector, Tracy Mathena, Tim Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Anderson, et al
as 7:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
David Anderson, Tracy Mathena, Sgt. J. Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Assistant Warden Joseph D. Bateman, Chief of Security Howard Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakur v. Sherwood et al
as 7:2022cv00645
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shakur
Defendant:
Sherwood, M. Breniger, May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
