Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Ivey
as 4:2024cv00395
Petitioner:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Respondent:
Governor Katherine Ivey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sherman v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Steven Sherman
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Ivey et al
as 4:2022cv00974
Petitioner:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Respondent:
Governor Katherine Ivey, John Hamm, Adrienne Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Shearon et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
CO Tucker, CO Sherman, Sgt. Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Ivey et al
as 4:2021cv01124
Petitioner:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Respondent:
Governor Katherine Ivey, Commissioner Jefferson Dunn, Warden Errol Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Broadhead v. Lockett
as 1:2021cv00041
Defendant:
John R. Lockett
Plaintiff:
Sherman Antwan Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Pavirov et al
as 5:2019cv00888
Defendant:
Juan Bailey, Florence, Corizon Health Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunning v. USA
as 1:2017cv00174
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sherman Dunning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Phillips v. Robbins et al
as 5:2016cv01483
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Jerry Edward Robbins, Jr, Ivan Provision, Sussmune Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
