Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Kluver v. Pesterfield
as 1:2023cv02974
Plaintiff:
Kirk Everett Kluver
Defendant:
Director Walter Pesterfield, Dr. Barnes, Dr. Perpetua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Prigg v. Baltimore County Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2022cv03105
Plaintiff:
Darius Lamont Prigg
Defendant:
Baltimore County Department of Corrections, Ofc. Walker, Ofc. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hammock v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Officer J. Sherman, Sgt. Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Sutton v. Director Gail Watts et al
as 1:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Douglas McArthur Sutton, III
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Sgt. Salisbury, Sgt. Carter, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv03309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03096
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
