Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Sherman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Sherman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Angolone et al
as 1:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Orell Logan
Defendant:
Ronald Angolone, Gary Bass, Harold W. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Chapman et al
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ray Brooks
Defendant:
Tonya D. Chapman, Kemba Smith Pradia, A. Lincoln James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Argenbright v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sherman D. Argenbright
Defendant:
Margaret K. Garber and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cooke v. CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation et al
as 1:2021cv01401
Defendant:
Ryan Denise Estes, Cathy Korell, CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kent Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Adkins v. Chapman et al
as 1:2021cv01061
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Adkins
Defendant:
Toya D Chapman, Rev. A. Lincoln James and Sherman P. Lea, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. M&J Auto Center, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00497
Plaintiff:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Defendant:
M&J Auto Center, LLC, Marlon Harvey, Darrin Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Davis v. Sherman
as 7:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
Paul Christopher Davis
Defendant:
J. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
