Cases 1 - 10 of 34
SHIMMIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14460
Plaintiff:
JASON SHIMMIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Sloan v. Cisneros et al
as 1:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Sloan, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, P. Llamas, S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rafael Pulido v. Jose Tovar et al
as 2:2023cv03342
Plaintiff:
Rafael Pulido
Defendant:
Jose Tovar, Skyeler Shimmin and Sarabjot Kaur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHIMMIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
JASON LANE SHIMMIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richard Evans v. J. Ourique, et al
as 22-16905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. OURIQUE, Associate Warden, J. COLLINS, P. BRIGHTWELL and others
Lyralisa Stevens v. S. Smith, et al
as 22-16850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYRALISA LAVENS STEVENS
Defendant / Appellee:
S. SMITH, C. MARTINEZ and A. SHIMMIN
Jonathan Kohut v. USDC-CAFR
as 22-70261
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JONATHAN KOHUT, ANDREANA WINTER, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary of CDCR and others
Petitioner:
JONATHAN KOHUT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
(PC) Reyes v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
Reuben Joseph Reyes
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Howard E. Moseley, Ron Godwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stevens v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00741
Plaintiff:
Lyralisa Lavena Stevens
Defendant:
S. Smith, C. Martinez and A. Shimmin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott Shimmin v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
Scott Shimmin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
