Cases 1 - 10 of 474
Gomes Calixto v. Garland
as 24-1151
Petitioner:
NACIPE GOMES CALIXTO, JULIANA DA SILVA GUEDES and MARIA ALICE GUEDES CALIXTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Silva v. Commissioner of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Cordaryl D Silva
Respondent:
Commissioner of Correction and Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silva v. Principal Life Insurance Co.
as 7:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
Ana Silva
Defendant:
Principal Life Ins. Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Jordan v. Dept. of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept of Correction, Wilson, Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Victor L Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin, Oles, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wymer v. Cartesian Therapeutics, Inc. f/k/a Selecta Biosciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Paul Wymer
Defendant:
Cartesian Therapeutics, Inc. f/k/a Selecta Biosciences, Inc., Carrie S. Cox, Timothy Barabe and others
Lane v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Myra Lane
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
McDaniel v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
John McDaniel
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
Silva et al v. Schmidt Baking Distribution, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01695
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Silva and Phil Rothkugel
Defendant:
Schmidt Baking Distribution, LLC and Schmidt Baking Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
