Cases 1 - 10 of 27
SIMS v. GREYHOUND MAINTENANCE CENTER et al
as 2:2023cv02149
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE SIMS
Defendant:
GREYHOUND MAINTENANCE CENTER and GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
D.J. et al v. UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS et al
as 2:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
D.J., TONI CORDOVA, JOHN CORTINA and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS, ADEMOLA ABIOSE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SIMS v. PENN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2020cv01130
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, DETECTIVE KRAH, BUREAU OF NARCOTIC INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff:
NEAL SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01883
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
RUFFINGS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2019cv00601
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER ANTHONY SAXBY, CORRECTIONS OFFICER ALFRED GREGORY, JR., CORRECTIONS OFFICER JASON MARSHALL and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RUFFINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOULIHAN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv00485
Defendant:
JASON MARSHALL, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, EDWIN NEGRON and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOULIHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
