Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clark v. Dadisman et al.
as 5:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Clark
Defendant:
Detective Shaun Dadisman, Detective Gohlike, Officer Slack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slack v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Kim Slack
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Slack et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22418
Plaintiff:
Bradley A. Slack and Tonya E. Slack
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Crace v. Efaw et al
as 2:2009cv00551
Plaintiff:
David B. Crace
Defendant:
Amanda Efaw, Blake, Richard L. Slack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slack v. Commisioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2008cv02380
Plaintiff:
Linda Slack
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security Administration and Commisioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HMV Properties, LLC et al v. IDC Ohio Holdings, LLC dba IDC Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00895
Plaintiff:
HMV Properties, LLC, HMV Properties, LLC, HMV Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
IDC Ohio Holdings, LLC dba IDC Holdings, LLC, IDC Ohio Management, LLC, Tom Slack and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crace v. Patrolman Wallace F. Workman et al
as 2:2007cv00232
Plaintiff:
David B. Crace and David B. Crace
Defendant:
Wallace F. Workman, Luke Jenkins, Wes Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
