Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Solis v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00188
Plaintiff:
Anabel Solis
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Solis v. Stellar Recovery, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00508
Plaintiff:
Rafael Solis
Defendant:
Stellar Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Solis v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00879
Plaintiff:
Sherry L. Solis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Solis v. Vinson et al
as 1:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Keith Vinson, Tradition, LLC and Tradition, LLC Group Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Solis v. Tripp Mechanical Services, et al
as 4:2013cv00011
Defendant:
Tripp Mechanical Services, Jarvis Edward Tripp, Jr., Gina Tripp and others
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SOLIS et al v. ROWAN BUSINESS FORMS et al
as 1:2012mc00076
Petitioner:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Complainant:
ROBERT MYERS
Respondent:
ROWAN BUSINESS FORMS, RICHARD H. HARDESTY, II, ROWAN PAPER COMPANY and others
Solis v. First Restoration Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00828
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
First Restoration Services, Inc., Frank Headen and First Restoration Services, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Solis v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00784
Plaintiff:
Sherry Solis
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SOLIS v. DENNIS
as 1:2012cv01109
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
TONY M. DENNIS, BETTY LAMBERT, MARIA MEYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
