Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Roque Solis v. Raymond Madden
as 23-55334
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROQUE SOLIS
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis v. M. Gutierrez, et al
as 23-15306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. GUTIERREZ, Warden, CHRISTENSEN, Lt., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis v. M. Gutierrez
as 23-15165
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS
Respondent / Appellee:
M. GUTIERREZ, Warden
Kohen Uhuru v. R. Singh, et al
as 23-15019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU
Defendant / Appellee:
R. SINGH, MICHAEL SCAMURRA, B. MICHELS and others
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis v. M. Gutierrez
as 22-16896
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS
Respondent / Appellee:
M. GUTIERREZ, Warden
Joseph Johnson v. A. Meyer, et al
as 22-16160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH JAMAUL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MEYER, Lt., A. MEDEN, Correctional Officer II, J. MARTINES, Correctional Officer II and others
Earl Warner v. Chris Tileston, et al
as 18-16467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL WARNER, AKA Earl Reed Warner
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIS TILESTON, Appeal Examiner, A. SOLIS, Chief Deputy Warden-Salinas Valley State Prison, S. GOMEZ, Classification Services Anaylst and others
Gregory Smith v. R. Cobb, et al
as 18-55545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
R. COBB, CCI SHARPE, J. CAREY and others
Tony Roberts v. J. Beard, et al
as 17-56830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY ANTHONY ROBERTS, AKA Tony Roberts
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BEARD, Secretary of CDCR, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden and others
Marlon Blacher v. J. Talley, et al
as 17-56370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON BLACHER, AKA Marlon Jessie Blacher
Defendant - Appellee:
J. TALLEY, Correctional Peace Officer, individual, J. RUPP, Correctional Peace Officer, individual, R. DENNIS, Correctional Peace Officer, individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
