Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marler v. USA
as 1:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Marler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Evans Delva and others
Defendant:
S. Thomas Anderson, Joann Garcia Camacho, Melanie Mendiola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raidoo et al v. Camacho, et al.
as 1:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Arthur San Agustin, Antonio Rapadas, Nathaniel Berg and others
Plaintiff:
Bliss Kaneshiro and Shandhini Raidoo
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peinhopf v. Leon Guerrero et al
as 1:2020cv00029
Plaintiff:
Thomas Peinhopf
Defendant:
Arthur San Agustine, Lourdes A. Leon Guerrero and Lourdes Leon Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1983
B.C. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana, a Corporation sole et al
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
B.C.
Defendant:
Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana, a Corporation sole , Thomas A. Camacho, DOE Entities 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cepeda v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana, a Corporation sole et al
as 1:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Cepeda, Sr.
Defendant:
Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana, a Corporation sole , Boy Scouts of America, Boy Scouts of America Aloha Council Chamorro District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Polevich v. Calvo's Selectcare et al
as 1:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Polevich
Defendant:
Calvo's Selectcare and Does 1 Through 20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Banks v. Pivnichny
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joseph, D.V.M. v. Abrams et al
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Joel Joseph
Defendant:
Benjamin Abrams, David Highsmith, James Gillian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
