Cases 1 - 10 of 8,568
Hatter v. DART et al
as 1:2024cv04735
Plaintiff:
Daneka Hatter
Defendant:
THOMAS DART, Supt. Cintron, Sgt. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04721
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Delores Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powell v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01457
Petitioner:
James Powell
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Corbin et al v. Layma, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04646
Defendant:
Layma, LLC also known as Layama, LLC doing business as Little Lake Lending, Ben G. Ray, III, John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Samantha Corbin and Thomas Ross
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Arnold III v. Raoul et al
as 1:2024cv04614
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold III
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Thomas J. Dart, J.B. Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01444
Petitioner:
James Lawrence Nance
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Essence USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02867
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Thomas
Defendant:
Essence USA Inc., Medical Guardian, LLC and Essence USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Battle v. Panarese
as 1:2024cv04597
Plaintiff:
Toy Thomas Battle
Defendant:
Donald Panarese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Battle v. Hood
as 1:2024cv04622
Plaintiff:
Toy Thomas Battle
Defendant:
Michael James Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
