Cases 41 - 50 of 857
El Moubarak v. Garland
as 22-6571
Petitioner:
AHMED SALEM EL MOUBARAK and MAIMOUNA MOHAMED VALL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALVAREZ et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
JOSUE ALVAREZ, RODOLFO ALVAREZ, MICHAEL T. ARASHIRO and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Valle Nava v. Garland
as 22-1832
Petitioner:
TIMOTEO VALLE NAVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
VALLE et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17250
Plaintiff:
RICHARD VALLE and MANUEL A COLON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Valle
as 22-40502
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Cesar Valle
USA v. Adam Vallely
as 22-30105
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM LEE VALLELY
Abaray et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as DE/1:22-CV-00841
Plaintiff:
Abaray, George Abaray, Juan Adame and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Arias Alfaro et al
as 1:2022at00319
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Luis Arias Alfaro individually and d/b/a Mercado Carniceria Del Valle and Jose B Salazar individually and d/b/a Mercado Carniceria Del Valle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Arias Alfaro et al
as 1:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Luis Arias Alfaro individually Doing business as Mercado Carniceria Del Valle and Jose B Salazar individually Doing business as Mercado Carniceria Del Valle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
