Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Valles v. Attorney General of the United States (S.D.N.Y) et al
as 1:2022cv07870
Plaintiff:
Andrew Valles
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States (S.D.N.Y), Attorney General of the State of California (S.D.Cal.) and Attorney General of the State of Utah (D.UT.)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Broome County et al
as 9:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Makyyla Holland
Defendant:
Broome County, David E. Harder, Mark Smolinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Palmer et al
as 7:2021cv08078
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tennessee S. Palmer and A. Valle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Palmer et al
as 7:2021cv07277
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Haywood
Defendant:
Tennessee S. Palmer and A. Valle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atutis v. Harder et al
as 9:2021cv00715
Plaintiff:
Adrian M. Atutis and Adriane Maur Atutis
Defendant:
Adam Valls, Nickolas Troutman, Butte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
del Valle v. Leonard
as 9:2020cv01369
Plaintiff:
Ralph del Valle
Defendant:
Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Don Valles v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv09242
Defendant:
State of California, United States of America and State of Utah
Plaintiff:
Andrew Don Valles, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valles v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv07835
Plaintiff:
Andrew Valles
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blanford v. Dooley et al
as 9:2020cv00219
Defendant:
Adam Valls, Superintendent of Elmira Corr. Fac., Joseph Zikuski and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Blanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valle-Santo v. Fogg
as 1:2019cv04300
Respondent:
Walter Fogg
Petitioner:
Julio Valle-Santo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
