Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Vega v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Alfredo Vega
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vega v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development et al
as 2:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Pablito Vega
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, Adjudicator 4318, Rohit Rangarajan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vega v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00822
Petitioner:
David Vega, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Vega, Juan v. Rouse Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Vega
Defendant:
Rouse Management, Inc., Cortland Pond Apartments, LLP, Watts Hill Apartments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Cunningham v. Kenosha County et al
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jesse M Cunningham, III
Defendant:
Kenosha County, Kenosha County Prosecutor Office, Kenosha County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintero v. Vega et al
as 2:2019cv00759
Plaintiff:
Ernest Quintero
Defendant:
Kenosha Police Department, Police Officer Vega, Police Officer Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega v. Winkleski
as 2:2019cv00685
Respondent:
Daniel Winkleski
Petitioner:
Jose A Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vega, Alfredo et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2018cv00678
Defendant:
Linda Alsum-O'Donovan and Lieutenant Anderson
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Vega
Undetermined:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01646
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
