Cases 1 - 10 of 1,265
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
Mark Hayes
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
David Anderson, K. Burcham, CJ MacVean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manzo-Hernandez v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Francisco Manzo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Chief of Security Headquarters, T.A. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Chadwick Dotson
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Graves
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Mr. Dillon, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipford v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
Keon Deshea Lipford
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
