Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Langwell v. USA
as 2:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Weston Scott Langwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024xc00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. Weston Tees LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02303
Defendant:
WESTON GRIFFIN, DEVON WALDEN, Weston Tees LLC DBA Texas Tees and others
Plaintiff:
Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson America, Inc., Epson Portland Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Donley v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
as 6:2022cv01192
Plaintiff:
Weston Donley
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzales v. Petterson et al
as 5:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzales
Defendant:
Mallory Petterson, Benjamin Lodi, Jaime Blaunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRWD, LLC et al v. Weston Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
FRWD, LLC and Fred Feurtado
Defendant:
Weston Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gonzales v. Klein et al
as 5:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Louis Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Felix Klein, Scot Say, NFN Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Diaz et al
as 5:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Misty Diaz, Chris Weston, Craig Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
