Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Pointer v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pointer
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Ron O'Brian, Michael Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Whitten v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02076
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damron et al v. Dodrill et al
as 2:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
James E Damron and Ray Scott Heid
Defendant:
Len Dodrill, Eric Graves, Melody Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Berenson et al
as 1:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Dodson
Defendant:
David Berenson and J Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Berenson et al
as 2:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Dodson
Defendant:
David Berenson and J Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv01507
Plaintiff:
Sandra Whitten
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Durham v. Mohr et al
as 2:2014cv00581
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Durham, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Rob Jeffreys, L C Coval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritteger et al v. Chesapeake Exploration et al
as 4:2013cv00391
Plaintiff:
Bernard A. Ritteger II , Donna D. Ritteger , Bernard A. Ritteger III and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. , Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. , Statoil USA Onshore Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Brown v. Mohr et al
as 1:2012cv00583
Plaintiff:
Steven S. Brown
Defendant:
Director Mohr, Mary Anne Reese, Austin Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
