Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Whittington v. National Seating & Mobility, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03226
Plaintiff:
Richard Whittington
Defendant:
National Seating & Mobility, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Veselich v. Ashtabula County, Ohio et al.
as 1:2023cv02237
Plaintiff:
BELINDA VESELICH
Defendant:
ASHTABULA COUNTY OHIO, ASHTABULA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ASHTABULA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittington v. Philips Respironics, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
Richard Whittington
Defendant:
Philips Respironics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Whittington v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06308
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Vivian Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whittington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45541
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kaegan Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whittington v. USA
as 1:2017cv00446
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Darryl Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Glasscock v. Mt. Orab Village of et al
as 1:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
John R. Glasscock
Defendant:
Mt. Orab Village of, George Baker, Ryan Gergory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whittington v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01891
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Whittington
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whittington v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01879
Plaintiff:
Homer Whittington
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
