Cases 1 - 10 of 1,281
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Ying Sun v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 2:2023cv03993
Plaintiff:
YING SUN
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01933
Lead Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
He v. United States of America
as 23-780
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Xuejie He
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, State of New Jersey and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Knieriem v. Catalyst Biosciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
FRANK KNIERIEM
Defendant:
CATALYST BIOSCIENCES, INC., NASSIM USMAN, AUGUSTINE LAWLOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
He v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Xuejie He
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, State of New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
