Cases 31 - 40 of 42
HSIEH v. NQ MOBILE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01048
Plaintiff:
JOHN HSIEH
Defendant:
NQ MOBILE, INC., PIPER JAFFRAY & CO., OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC. and others
Movant:
The Gulotta Family Group , NQ Investor Group and NQ Mobile Investor Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Hernandez et al v. New China Panda Super Buffet, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv01047
Defendant:
Yue Ying Chen, Ai Guo Jiang and New China Panda Super Buffet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Gonzalez, Mario Hernandez, Ricardo Martagon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
R P M Pizza L L C v. T E Q Land Co et al
as 6:2012cv00490
Plaintiff:
R P M Pizza L L C
Defendant:
T E Q Land Co, Feng Fu Yang and Ying Juan Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Cruz v. Irving Panda B.B.Q., Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03266
Plaintiff:
Jaime Salazar De La Cruz
Defendant:
Irving Panda B.B.Q., Inc. and Min Ying Chang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP v. K.S. Dollar, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv01401
Plaintiff:
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP
Defendant:
K.S. Dollar, Inc., Inspiration Planet, Inc., USA Homemax, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Li v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv02097
Plaintiff:
Ying Li
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Chemg v. Mukasey
as 08-60139
Petitioner:
YING YUN CHEMG
Respondent:
MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Celodonio et al v. Yuan Tai Furniture, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00102
Defendant:
Yuan Tai Furniture, Inc., Heng Wei chen and Carine Shu-Ying Chen
Plaintiff:
Fernando Celedonio and Jonathan sanchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
