Cases 41 - 50 of 524
LOMBARDOZZI v. JIANG et al
as 4:2023cv00182
Defendant:
WEOZHONG JIANG, MING CHENG WANG, WEI ZHONG JIANG and others
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE LOMBARDOZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MARTINEZ v. UNKNOWN
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
NELSON MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MILLER, SGT ANDERSON, UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. CARTER et al
as 3:2023cv08553
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L BLAKE
Defendant:
J CARTER, J COON, B JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. ORTEGA et al
as 3:2023cv08554
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L BLAKE
Defendant:
ORTEGA, J COON, ROESKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdel-Fattah v. Belal et al
as 6:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Khaled Abdel-Fattah
Defendant:
Fatima Belal and Mohamed Z. Delhoum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nelson, IV v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Wesley Tillman Nelson, IV
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, T. K. Waters, D. H. Bostic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sweet v. E-Z Distribution, LLC
as 8:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE SWEET
Defendant:
E-Z DISTRIBUTION, LLC E-Z DISTRIBUTION, LLC (d/b/a EZ KRATOM) and E-Z Distribution, LLC doing business as EZ Kratom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JAFFEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06111
Plaintiff:
AARON Z JAFFEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Qaasim v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Saleel Z. Qaasim
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BERRY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv05677
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BURKE BERRY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICKY DIXON, Z CULPEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
