Cases 1 - 10 of 510
Haas v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65570
Plaintiff:
Aaron A. Haas
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woodrow v. Tango Fiber, INC
as 3:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Aaron Woodrow
Defendant:
TANGO FIBER, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McElravy v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02201
Plaintiff:
Aaron McElravy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark v. Blueprint Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Blueprint Investments, LLC, Brysod Anderson, Aaron McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02005
Plaintiff:
Vance Aaron Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01833
Plaintiff:
Aaron Fuller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Inlow v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01466
Plaintiff:
Aaron Inlow
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kacmarcik v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kacmarcik
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
