Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Porter v. Tynes et al
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Johnathan Tynes, Charles Griffin, Aaron Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. Alexandria et al
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Alexandria, Mark Wood, Colin Radar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Rabb et al
as 2:2023cv05865
Plaintiff:
Darryl Flanders Robinson
Defendant:
Steven Rabb, Ched Sanchez, Terrence Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wright et al
as 1:2023cv01123
Plaintiff:
Ron Cleon Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Stuart Wright, Roger Henson, Aaron Sines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daigle v. Gartro et al
as 3:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
554337 Aaron Daigle
Defendant:
Unknown Gartro, Unknown Wolf, Dustin Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Federal Government
as 3:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Aaron Wallace
Defendant:
Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Sabine Parish et al
as 5:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome James
Defendant:
Sheriff of Sabine Parish, Aaron Mitchell, Berlin Sweet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spikes v. Executive Parole and Probation et al
as 2:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
Executive Parole and Probation and Aaron Moran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Saucier v. Rowley
as 3:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Aaron Saucier
Defendant:
John F. Rowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Lopinto
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph Lopinto, Brianne Carter, Aaron Savoie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
