Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Ronald Tussey, et al v. Fidelity Management Trust Co., et al
as 12-3794
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ronald C. Tussey, Charles E. Fisher, Timothy Herndron and others
Defendant:
ABB, Inc., John W. Cutler, Jr., Pension Review Committee of ABB, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Fidelity Management Trust Company and Fidelity Management & Research Company
Donahue v. ABB, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00789
Plaintiff:
Perry Donahue
Defendant:
ABB, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Reese v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00679
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Reese
Defendant:
ABB, Inc. and Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
M.W. v. United Behavioral Health et al
as 2:2012cv04993
Defendant:
Abb Inc Flexible Benefits Plan and United Behavioral Health
Plaintiff:
M. W.
Ronald Tussey, et al v. Fidelity Management Trust Co., et al
as 12-2060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ronald C. Tussey, Charles E. Fisher, Timothy Herndron and others
Defendant:
ABB, Inc., John W. Cutler, Jr., Pension Review Committee of ABB, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Fidelity Management Trust Company and Fidelity Management & Research Company
Ronald Tussey, et al v. ABB, Inc., et al
as 12-2056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ronald C. Tussey, Charles E. Fisher, Timothy Herndron and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ABB, Inc., John W. Cutler, Jr., Pension Review Committee of ABB, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Fidelity Management Trust Company and Fidelity Management & Research Company
Madonia v. ABB Inc et al
as 4:2009cv02869
Plaintiff:
Mary Madonia
Defendant:
ABB Inc and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cynthia Howser v. ABB
as 06-3403
Plaintiff:
Myrl Copeland, Stanley Halderman, Elaine Backes and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cynthia Howser
Defendant - Appellant:
ABB, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
