Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sx Job Discrimination (Sex)
Davis v. Acacia Network Housing, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv08258
Plaintiff:
Kicena Davis
Defendant:
Acacia Network Housing, Inc. and Acacia Network Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 25-2544
Plaintiff:
JOSETTE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FLORA ANTWI, DNP, CASA MARIA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER and others
Avila v. Acacia Network
as 24-2752
Plaintiff:
JIMMY AVILA
Defendant:
NYC ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES, THOMAS GLENOY, APS Senior Supervisor, 1412 COLLEGE AVENUE LLC and others
Rodriguez v. Antwi, DNP et al
as 1:2024cv02941
Plaintiff:
Josette Rodriguez
Defendant:
Flora Antwi, DNP, Casa Maria Community Health Center and ACACIA Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Inc., Trevor Griffiths, Aja Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Inc., Trevor Griffiths, Aja Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07834
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Inc. and Trevor Griffiths
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
