Civil Rights Cases
Garred Norman v. State Bar of California, et al
as 23-16105
Plaintiff / Appellant: GARRED F. NORMAN
Defendant / Appellee: STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, BAY AREA LEGAL AID and others
Garred Norman v. The White House, et al
as 22-16519
Plaintiff / Appellant: GARRED F. NORMAN
Defendant / Appellee: THE WHITE HOUSE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President and others
Mark McDonald et al v. Kristina D. Lawson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01805
Plaintiff: Mark McDonald and Jeff Barke
Defendant: Kristina D. Lawson, Randy W. Hawkins, Laurie Rose Lubiano and others
Intervenor: Emanuel McCray
Petitioner: ACLU of Northern California and ACLU of Southern California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist., et al
as 16-55425
Plaintiff / Appellee: FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, JAMES NA, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in his official representative capacity, SYLVIA OROZCO, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in her official representative capacity and others
Intervenor: ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBERS KEN WILLIAMS, MARI BARKE, LISA SPARKS, JOHN BEDELL, REBECCA GOMEZ, IN THEIR OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITIES
Amicus Curiae: JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and others
Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-55425
Plaintiff - Appellee: FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, JAMES NA, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in his official representative capacity, SYLVIA OROZCO, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in her official representative capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and others
Tom Campbell, et al v. AT&T Communications of Califor, et al
as 09-16684
Plaintiff - Appellant: TOM CAMPBELL, GEORGE MAIN, DENNIS P. RIORDAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, a corporation and AT&T CORP., a corporation
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS
Tash Hepting, et al
as 09-16670
Plaintiff - Appellant: TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS, CAROLYN JEWEL and others
Alpha Delta Chi-Delta Chapter, et al v. Charles Reed, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-55299
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALPHA DELTA CHI-DELTA CHAPTER, a sorority at San Diego State University, ALPHA GAMMA OMEGA-EPSILON CHAPTER, a fraternity at San Diego State University, MELISSA PEREA, an individual, FKA Melissa Travis and others
Plaintiff: EVERY NATION CAMPUS MINISTRIES AT SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, a student organization at San Diego State University, EVERY NATION CAMPUS MINISTRIES AT LONG BEACH STATE UNIVERSITY, a student organization at California State University, Long Beach, HALEY HAWTHORNE, an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES B. REED, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the California State University, STEVEN L. WEBER, in his official capacity as President of San Diego State University and DOUGLAS CASE, individually and in his official capacity as Coordinator of Fraternity and Sorority Life at San Diego State University
Defendant: F KING ALEXANDER, in his official capacity as President of California State University, Long Beach and JEFFREY KLAUS, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Student Life and Development at California State University, Long Beach
Amicu: ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA and ACLU OF SAN DIEGO & IMPERIAL COUNTIES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?