Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Atkins v. Jordan et al
as 1:2024cv02970
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Atkins
Defendant:
Carol Ann Jordan, Commissioner Molly Wasow, New York State Division of Child Support and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Administration for Childeren Services Bronx Family Court, et al
as 1:2021cv02832
Defendant:
Chava White, Honorable Judge Tilang and Administration for Children Services Family Court
Plaintiff:
Shoshanna Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New York Civil Liberties Union v. Administration for Children and Families et al
as 1:2020cv00183
Defendant:
Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Office of Refugee Resettlement
Plaintiff:
New York Civil Liberties Union
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Ward v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00370
Defendant:
Administration for Children and Family Services, Commissioner of Social Security, New York City Bureau of Vital Statistics and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv06690
Plaintiff:
Kareem Ward
Defendant:
Administration for Children and Family Services, Commissioner of Social Security, New York City Bureau of Vital Statistics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maldonado v. Lloyd
as 18-2177
Petitioner - Appellee:
Gloria Escobar Maldonado, on her own behalf and on behalf of E.H.E., her minor son, as his next friend
Respondent - Appellant:
Director Scott Lloyd, Office of Refugee ReSettlement, Deputy Director Jonathan White, Director, Office of Refugee Resettlement, Steven Wagner, Acting Assistant Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-182
Plaintiff:
Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually, Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-185
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-180
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 16-3941
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
