Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Beaty v. Fox et al
as 2:2026cv01267
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lewis Beaty
Defendant:
Fox, William E Donaldson Correctional Facility and ADOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kister v. Warden McKee et al
as 2:2026cv00580
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Warden Mckee and ADOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Thornell, et al.
as 26-4456
Petitioner:
MELVIN WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, Director, ADOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Crowden v. ADOC Security et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00456
Plaintiff:
Steven Crowden
Defendant:
ADOC Security, Captain Griffin and Stephanie S. Jetton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billingsley v. Alabama Department of ADOC (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00250
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of ADOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. ADOC Officers
as 2:2026cv00377
Plaintiff:
Spanley Harris
Defendant:
ADOC Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faulkner v. Shinn, et al.
as 26-736
Defendant:
CHARLES L RYAN, named as Charles Ryan, retired Director of ADOC, DAVID SHINN, Director of ADOC, Charles Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JAMES FAULKNER
Kendarius Butler v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 26-10363
Plaintiff:
KENDARIUS DEANDRE BUTLER
Defendant:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTH CARE, YESCARE INC. and others
Coley v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00003
Plaintiff:
Reginald Coley
Defendant:
Dr. Siddiq, Yes Care and ADOC Director of Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Barnes et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv01032
Plaintiff:
Thomas F. Moody
Defendant:
Lt. Barnes and ADOC Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
