Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
AEROPLATE CORP. v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00374
Plaintiff: AEROPLATE CORP.
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATTERSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv03285
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RONALD D. PATTERSON, REDI-CORP OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA and AEROPLATE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. PATTERSON et al
as 2:2012cv03191
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CM3 BUILDING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant: RONALD D. PATTERSON and AEROPLATE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. PATTERSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02634
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and XLE METALS, INC.
Defendant: RONALD DUANE PATTERSON, REDI-CORP OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA and AEROPLATE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF DELAWARE VALLEY CONCRETE CO., INC. v. AEROPLATE CORP. et al
as 2:2012cv02514
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF DELAWARE VALLEY CONCRETE CO., INC.
Defendant: AEROPLATE CORP. and RONALD D. PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF STEVEN F. KEMPF BUILDING MATERIAL COMPANY v. AEROPLATE CORP. et al
as 2:2012cv02404
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF STEVEN F. KEMPF BUILDING MATERIAL COMPANY
Defendant: AEROPLATE CORP. and RONALD D. PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF MARJAM SUPPLY COMPANY v. AEROPLATE CORP. et al
as 2:2012cv02167
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF MARJAM SUPPLY COMPANY
Defendant: AEROPLATE CORP., MARY WILLIAMS and RONALD D. PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES v. PATTERSON et al
as 2:2012cv01660
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES
Defendant: RONALD D. PATTERSON and AEROPLATE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Miller Act
United State of America for the use and benefit of Progressive Services, Inc. d/b/a Progressive Roofing v. Aeroplate Corp. et al
as 1:2009at00626
Plaintiff: United State of America for the use and benefit of Progressive Services, Inc. d/b/a Progressive Roofing
Defendant: Aeroplate Corp. and Ronald D. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
Type: Contract None
United State of America for the use and benefit of Progressive Services, Inc. d/b/a Progressive Roofing v. Aeroplate Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01391
Plaintiff: United State of America for the use and benefit of Progressive Services, Inc.
Defendant: Aeroplate Corp. and Ronald D. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?