Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lowe v. City of Montgomery, Alabama et al
as 2:2026cv00673
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Lowe
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, Montgomery City Counsel, Steven L. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Moore v. Southern Company, et al
as 26-12786
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY MOORE
Defendant:
SOUTHERN COMPANY, CHRIS WOMACK, ALABAMA POWER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Citimortgage Inc v. Cunningham et al
as 2:2026cv00520
Plaintiff:
Citimortgage Inc
Defendant:
Tara Kidd Cunningham, Walter Cunningham, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Domeneque Perry v. Alabama Power Company, et al
as 26-10525
Plaintiff:
DOMENEQUE PERRY
Defendant:
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, CYNTHIA ALMOND and AQUILLA SPIVEY
Domeneque Perry v. Alabama Power Company, et al
as 26-10526
Plaintiff:
DOMENEQUE PERRY
Defendant:
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, CYNTHIA ALMOND and AQUILLA SPIVEY
Perry v. Alabama Power Company et al
as 2:2026cv00121
Plaintiff:
Domeneque Perry
Defendant:
Alabama Power Company, Cynthia Almond and Aquilla Spivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Southern Company et al
as 2:2025cv02146
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Southern Company, Chris Womack, Alabama Power and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. Alabama Power Company
as 1:2025cv00488
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Smith
Defendant:
Alabama Power Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wones et al v. Robison Wones et al
as 2:2025cv01822
Plaintiff:
Brittany Wones and K.M.
Defendant:
Margie Jan Robison Wones, Allan Keith Morris, The Estate of Joshua B. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
