Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cenk Uygur v. South Carolina Democratic Party
as 24-1052
Plaintiff: CENK UYGUR and JOHN WARD
Defendant: SOUTH CAROLINA, HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina and others
SC State Conference of the NAACP v. Alan Wilson
as 23-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, MARVIN NEAL, ROBYNNE CAMPBELL and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Carolina Youth Action Project v. Alan Wilson
as 21-2166
Plaintiff / Appellee: CAROLINA YOUTH ACTION PROJECT, D.S., by and through her next of kin Juanita Ford, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and S.P., by and through her next of kin Melissa Downs, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: NIYA KENNY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and TAUREAN NESMITH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Defendant: J. ALTON CANNON, JR., in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Charleston County, SC; on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, LUTHER T. REYNOLDS, in his official capacity as the Chief of the Police Department of the City of Charleston, SC, REGINALD L. BURGESS, in his official capacity as the Chief of the Police Department of the City of North Charleston, SC and others
Disability Rights South Carolina v. Henry McMaster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2070
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISABILITY RIGHTS SOUTH CAROLINA, ABLE SOUTH CAROLINA, AMANDA MCDOUGALD SCOTT, individually and on behalf of P.S., a minor and others
Defendant / Appellant: HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina
Defendant: MOLLY SPEARMAN, in her official capacity as State Superintendent of Education, GREENVILLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, HORRY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, SOUTH CAROLINA CHAPTER OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Alan Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1369
Defendant: EDWARD SIMMER, in his official capacity as Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, SCARLETT A. WILSON, in her official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 9th Judicial Circuit, CHRISTOPHER C. WRIGHT, in his official capacity as a Member of the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: GREENVILLE WOMEN'S CLINIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff, PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff and TERRY L. BUFFKIN, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients
Intervenor: HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of South Carolina and JAMES H. LUCAS, a/k/a Jay, in his official capacity as Speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM WALTER WILKINS, III, in his official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 13th Judicial Circuit and ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Niya Kenny v. Alan Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant: NIYA KENNY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, TAUREAN NESMITH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, GIRLS ROCK CHARLESTON, INCORPORATED, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, J. ALTON CANNON, JR., in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Charleston County, SC; on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, GREGORY G. MULLEN, in his official capacity as the Chief of the Police Department of the City of Charleston, SC; on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and others
Katherine Bradacs v. Alan Wilson
as 14-2337
Plaintiff - Appellee: KATHERINE BRADACS and TRACIE GOODWIN
Defendant - Appellant: ALAN WILSON, In his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Defendant: NIMRATA R. HALEY, a/k/a Nikki Haley, in her official capacity as Governor of South Carolina
Anne Bleckley v. Alan Wilson
as 14-2241
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANNE NICHOLS BLECKLEY and COLLEEN THERESE CONDON
Defendant - Appellant: ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General
Defendant: IRVIN G. CONDON, in his official capacity as Probate Judge of Charleston County
Lowcountry Immigration v. Nikki Haley
as 12-2533
Plaintiff - Appellee: LOWCOUNTRY IMMIGRATION COALITION, MUJERES DE TRIUNFO, NUEVOS CAMINOS and others
Defendant - Appellant: NIKKI HALEY, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Carolina and ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
Defendant: JAMES ALTON CANNON, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Charleston County and SCARLETT A. WILSON, in her official capacity as Solicitor of the Ninth Judicial Circuit
US v. State of South Carolina
as 12-2514
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LOWCOUNTRY IMMIGRATION COALITION, MUJERES DE TRIUNFO and others
Defendant - Appellant: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, NIKKI HALEY, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Carolina, NIKKI HALEY, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Carolina and others
Defendant: JAMES ALTON CANNON, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Charleston County and SCARLETT A. WILSON, in her official capacity as Solicitor of the Ninth Judicial Circuit

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?