Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castillo Ortega v. Garland
as 23-253
Petitioner:
MARIO ALBERTO CASTILLO ORTEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castillo-Lopez v. Garland
as 22-1796
Petitioner:
IVAN ALBERTO CASTILLO-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Bland et al
as 5:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
James Bland, Shannon Lingle, Alberto Castillo Montes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CASTILLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05167
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO CASTILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landa v. Western Union, LLC
as 1:2020cv03274
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Castill Landa and Carlos Alberto Castillo Landa
Defendant:
Western Union, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0101
Carlos Castillo v. William Barr
as 20-73125
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALBERTO CASTILLO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03052
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. De Vargas (Alomar-Cabrera)
as 19-2875
Defendant:
Rigoberto Rivera, AKA Chiquito, Ivan Paulino, Jose Castro, AKA Sergeant Chupa and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Wendell Alomar-Cabrera, AKA Gregorio
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
United States of America v. De Vargas (Julio De Vargas)
as 19-322
Defendant:
Rigoberto Rivera, AKA Chiquito, Ivan Paulino, Jose Castro, AKA Sergeant Chupa and others
Undetermined:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Julio Acosta De Vargas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
