Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Sight Sciences, Inc. v. Ivantis, Inc.
as 26-1878
Plaintiff:
SIGHT SCIENCES, INC.
Defendant:
IVANTIS, INC., ALCON RESEARCH, LLC, ALCON VISION, LLC and others
Alcon Inc. v. Padagis Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
as 25-1577
Plaintiff:
ALCON INC., ALCON VISION, LLC and ALCON LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
PADAGIS ISRAEL PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., PADAGIS US LLC and PADAGIS LLC
Alcon Inc. v. Padagis Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
as 25-1515
Plaintiff:
ALCON INC., ALCON VISION, LLC and ALCON LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
PADAGIS ISRAEL PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., PADAGIS LLC and PADAGIS US LLC
Mead v. Alevi, M.D. et al
as 1:2024cv08777
Plaintiff:
Wesley Mead
Defendant:
Alcon Inc., David Alevi, M.D. and South Bronx Eyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
In Re: Ivantis, Inc. et al
as 1:2023mc00373
Plaintiff:
Sight Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
Ivantis, Inc., Alcon Research LLC, Alcon Vision LLC and others
Sight Sciences, Inc. v. Ivantis, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03275
Plaintiff:
Sight Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
Ivantis, Inc., Alcon Research LLC, Alcon Vision, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Dr. Reay Brown
Rodgers v. Alcon Vision, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02197
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Renee Rodgers
Defendant:
Alcon Vision, LLC and Alcon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alcon Inc. et al v. Gland Pharma Limited
as 1:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Alcon Inc. and Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant:
Gland Pharma Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Alcon Inc. et al v. Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Alcon Inc. and Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant:
Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. v. Alcon Inc.
as 23-1477
Appellant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC.
Appellee:
ALCON INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.