Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Payton v. Kelly, et al
as 21-3088
Defendant / Appellee: NATHANAEL S. TIMM, Mailroom Clerk/Officer, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, in his official professional and non-professional individual capacities, HUTCHINSON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Mailroom, in its official professional and non-professional capacities, D. CLAY VANHOOSE, Major, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, in his official professional and non-professional individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WALTER ALMON PAYTON, AKA Walter Peyton, Inc.
Crispin v. Peiri
as 21-1283
Defendant / Appellee: Kocienda, Doctor, All defendants are being sued in their Individual capacity and Official capacity, John Doe, Correctional Officer, All defendants are being sued in their Individual capacity and Official capacity, Jane Doe, A.P.R.N. or Doctor, All defendants are being sued in their Individual capacity and Official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jossean Crispin
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-1254
Defendant / Appellee: Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Towaki Komatsu
Defendant: John Doe, 1,
Tyrone Shelton v. John Walrath
as 21-6655
Defendant: L. WANG, Prison Physician; All sued in their individual and official capacities, T. COBBS, Registered Nurse, TIM DOMINICK, Physician Assistant; All sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee: S. W. ALLEN, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; All sued in their individual and official capacities, DARRELL L. MILLER, Warden; All sued in their individual and official capacities, JOHN WALRATH, Regional Administrator; All sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TYRONE SHELTON
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-1114
Defendant / Appellee: Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Towaki Komatsu
Defendant: John Doe, 1,
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-844
Defendant / Appellee: Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Towaki Komatsu
Defendant: John Doe, 1,
Dupigny v. United States of America
as 21-816
Defendant / Appellee: Aaron Mysliwiec, Their officers and agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all others (including subsidiaries) in active concert or participation, in their official and individual capacity, Elinor Torlow, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Hubert Dupigny
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-408
Defendant / Appellee: Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Towaki Komatsu
Defendant: John Doe, 1,
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-409
Defendant / Appellee: Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Towaki Komatsu
Defendant: John Doe, 1,
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-389
Defendant / Appellee: Nick Smith, All of the defendants listed above who are people are being sued in their individual and official capacities, Andrew Berkowitz, (shield #7141), All of the defendants listed above who are people are being sued in their individual and official capacities, Sergeant Philip Sansone, All of the defendants listed above who are people are being sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Towaki Komatsu

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?