Cases 11 - 18 of 18
KELLY v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2010cv00273
Director Of Institutional Affairs And Complaint Investigation:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
Mr. _________ AMOS, JACK BINION, BEVERLY BLACK and others
Southern Regional Director:
RONDLE ANDERSON
Consumer Protection Division:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA
Commissioner I.D.O.C:
ED BUSS
Greivance Specialist:
JEFF COOPER and Lt. TIMOTHY NICKLES
Captain) (Indiana State Reformatory:
Mr. _____ DOWNEY
Superintendent:
ALLAN FINNAN and BRETT MIZE
Case Manager:
BRUCE HELMING and TOM RICHARDSON
Counselor:
MIKE KIDDER and SAMANTHA MADDOX
Chief Of Staff:
RANDY KOESTER
Policy Manager:
MICHAEL PAVESE
Director Of Internal Affair:
WILLARD PLANK and MIKE RAINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRONSON v. FINNAN
as 1:2008cv00737
Petitioner:
QUENTIN BRONSON
Respondent:
ALLAN FINNAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SZABO v. FINNAN
as 2:2008cv00089
Petitioner:
ROBERT J SZABO
Respondent:
ALLAN FINNAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROWN v. FINNAN
as 2:2007cv00301
Petitioner:
JERMAINE BROWN
Respondent:
ALLAN FINNAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHISMAR v. FINNAN et al
as 2:2007cv00253
Plaintiff:
JASON J. CHISMAR
Defendant:
ALLAN FINNAN, RANDY RASNER, LEE HOEFLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. FINNAN
as 2:2007cv00029
Petitioner:
BRYAN BROWN
Respondent:
ALLAN FINNAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leach v. Finnan
as 3:2007cv00050
Petitioner:
Walter M Leach
Respondent:
Allan Finnan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holleman v. Finnan
as 3:2007cv00041
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Holleman
Respondent:
Allan Finnan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
