Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2026cv00620
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Johnny B. Hall and Amee Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Sykes et al
as 7:2026cv00525
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Ms. P. Sykes, B. Bolling, Amee Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2026cv00479
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Amee Duncan, S. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollard v. Anderson et al
as 7:2026cv00424
Petitioner:
Shane D. Pollard
Respondent:
David Anderson and Amee Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Bolling et al
as 7:2026cv00411
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Bolling, E. Shirks, Major J.B. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollard v. Anderson et al
as 7:2026cv00351
Petitioner:
Shane D. Pollard
Respondent:
David Anderson and Amee Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pollard v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2026cv00330
Plaintiff:
Shane Dareon Pollard
Defendant:
Warden Israel Hamilton, Assistant Warden Amee Duncan, Charles Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sol-Damacus Burke v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 26-6431
Plaintiff:
SOL D. BURKE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, RED ONION STATE PRISON, DAVID E. ANDERSON, Warden, Red Onion State Prison and others
Meyers v. Shirks et al
as 7:2026cv00257
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Intel Officer E. Shirks, Intel Officer Mr. Ray Reye Reyes, Warden D. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Mullins et al
as 7:2026cv00243
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
D.R. Mullins, Lt. B. Bolling, Michael Pozeg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
