Cases 31 - 40 of 106
Cayuga County v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06106
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff:
Cayuga County, NY, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Nassau County, NY v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05382
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff:
Nassau County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Essex County, NY v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06097
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff:
Essex County, NY, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Tioga County v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06098
Defendant:
Indivior Inc, Assertio Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff:
Tioga County, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Westchester County v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06096
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Westchester County, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Tioga County, Cattaraugus County, NY, Putnam County, NY and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid of Maryland Inc. doing business as Mid-Atlantic Customer Support Center, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Duclau v. Boehringer Ingelheim et al
as 3:2023cv20352
Plaintiff:
Robert Duclau
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim, DSM Pharmaceuticals Inc., GlaxoSmithKline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser
as 20-2002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
American Sales Company, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. and others
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. American Sales Company, LLC
as 20-485
Respondent:
Cesar Castillo, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Takeda Pharamceuticals, U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Takeda America Holdings, Inc. and others
Township of Barnegat v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD et al
as 1:2019op45925
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Advantage Logistics, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Township of Barnega and Township of Bernegat
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Providence, et al v. Warner Chilcott (US), LLC, et al
as 19-8026
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WALGREEN CO. and others
Respondent:
ELECTRICAL WORKERS 242 & 294 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY III, LTD., LUPIN LTD. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
