Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Amira Salem, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 15-1694
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
AMIRA SALEM and KESHUNA ABCUMBY
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director at MDOC, THOMAS G. FINCO, Deputy Director MDOC and others
Amira Salem, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 15-1598
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMIRA SALEM and KESHUNA ABCUMBY
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director at MDOC, THOMAS G. FINCO, Deputy Director MDOC and others
Amira Salem v. Millicent Warren, et al
as 14-1974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMIRA SALEM
Defendant - Appellee:
MILLICENT WARREN, CINDY GREENLEAF, DEAN BATKINS and others
Salem et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv14567
Plaintiff:
Amira Salem and Keshuna Abcumby
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections , Daniel H. Heyns , THOMAS FINCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amira Salem v. Joan Yukins, et al
as 13-2036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMIRA SALEM
Defendant:
JOAN YUKINS, Warden, Warden, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
JUANITA BRYANT, Off-Site Coordinator and RAWLINS, Nurse
Amira Salem v. Millicent Warren
as 12-2310
Petitioner - Appellant:
AMIRA SALEM
Respondent - Appellee:
MILLICENT WARREN
Amira Salem v. Joan Yukins, et al
as 11-1240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMIRA SALEM
Defendant:
JOAN N. YUKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUANITA BRYANT, Off-Site Coordinator and RAWLINS
Salem v. Warren et al
as 2:2010cv11943
Plaintiff:
Amira Salem
Defendant:
Millicent Warren, Cindy Greenleaf, Dean Batkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amira Salem v. Joan Yukins, et al
as 10-1284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMIRA SALEM
Defendant - Appellee:
JOAN N. YUKINS, DAVIS, Acting Warden, SAWHNEY, Doctor and others
Salem v. Yukins et al
as 2:2004cv72250
Plaintiff:
Amira Salem
Defendant:
Sawhney , Nichols , Juanita Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
