Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Pryor et al v. Anderson et al
as 4:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Judy A. Pryor and Arnold L. Pryor
Defendant:
Daniel D. Anderson and Orthopaedic Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lee v. Meador et al
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
William Ray Lee
Defendant:
Tim Meador, Dewayne Stone, Josh Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Anderson v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tammy Anderson
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark, Steve Durham, Eric Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barbour v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
La Sandra Anderson Barbour
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson v. Scarborough
as 3:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Erik T. Anderson
Defendant:
J. J. Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Roddy Scott Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Deon'tae L. Williams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Seth Mitchell, Laura Plauppert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. The Andersons, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Andy Alford
Defendant:
The Andersons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 bc Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
McCubbin v. The Andersons, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Kevin McCubbin
Defendant:
The Andersons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 bc Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
